The border states especially, Missouri, Kentucky, and Maryland had especially high possibilities of this occurring, but within states like North Carolina, Virginia, east Tennessee, and even northern Alabama, there were high rates of anti-Confederate partisans and enlistments in the Union Armies.Ĭertainly in the regions where there was high partisan fighting, like in Missouri and eastern Tennessee, having loyalties be divided within town and county lines was very real, and since many of the areas in Tennessee were in mountain country and more isolated, it certainly would not be out of the question to have a high percentage of relatives on one side or the other, or both. The divided regions primarily consisted of areas in the slave-holding South that also had high amounts of Union sentiment. The idea, however, that you might have family loyalties split was very real, albeit limited to region. The "Brothers War" idea has sort of two meanings, but I won't try to delve too deep into the first: has often been used as a way to argue that "they were all Americans" as in, Confederate and Union soldiers were Americans and therefore "brothers." There is plenty wrong with that idea and goes far more toward memory of the war than reality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |